Mapping the Future - Land Resources of NTP 3910 in the Deep Well Area

Index:

Metadata
Citation
Description

Dataset Status
Data Quality
Contact Information
Data Dictionary
Supplementary Information

Metadata Details:

Name:AS/NZS ISO 19115 Geographic Information - Metadata, ANZLIC Metadata Profile

Version:1.0

Date Metadata Extracted:2025-11-01

Date Metadata Last Updated:2025-10-31

Current URL (HTML format) : http://www.ntlis.nt.gov.au/metadata/export_data?type=html&metadata_id=319B09E4D983F447E0632144CD9BDEBA

Current URL (XML format) : http://www.ntlis.nt.gov.au/metadata/export_data?type=xml&metadata_id=319B09E4D983F447E0632144CD9BDEBA

Citation

ANZLIC Identifier:319B09E4D983F447E0632144CD9BDEBA

Title: Mapping the Future - Land Resources of NTP 3910 in the Deep Well Area

Citation Date:2025-03-31

Date Type:creation

Custodian:Department of Lands, Planning and Environment

Description

Abstract:

This spatial dataset delineates land system boundaries of NTP 3910 in the Deep Well area at a scale of 1: 100,000. Dominant landform, soils and vegetation are described for each Land System, and general land capability is assessed. The study area covers approximately 2220 ha approximately 60 km south-east of Alice Springs.
The objectives of the investigation were to a. undertake a reconnaissance investigation to determine the general land capability of the area to support horticultural development, b. map and describe land resources within the study area. and c. generate land capability ratings for each land system facet based on assessment of soil and landscape attributes against an explicit set of criteria.

ANZLIC Search Words:

biota

environment

geoscientificInformation

Spatial Domain:

Bounding Coordinates:

North Bounding Coordinate:-24.137942

South Bounding Coordinate:-24.182623

East Bounding Coordinate:134.240473

West Bounding Coordinate:134.187786

Dataset Status

Dataset ID:

Language:English

Character Set: Latin 1

Progress:completed

Maintenance and Update Frequency:notPlanned

Data Currency Start Date:2025-03-31

Data Currency End Date:

Access Constraint:Download the spatial data package (contains spatial data, maps and reports) via data.nt.gov.au/

You are licensed to use the DLPE geospatial products on the terms and conditions set out in: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0) at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
If you do not agree to the terms and conditions you must not use the geospatial products.
You are free to copy, communicate and adapt the licensed material, provided that you abide by the licence terms (including Attribution) and attribute the licensed material using the statement:

Supplied by the Department of Lands, Planning and Environment. Copyright Northern Territory Government.

Data Quality

Lineage:Preliminary map unit boundaries delineated from interpretation of digital satellite imagery including ESRI Worl Imagery, Google Satellite Imagery, Sentinel-2 imagery, 1:250,000 scale geological maps (Northern Territory Geological Survey) and 1 second Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Digital Elevation Models Version 1.0.
Field data described and classified according to national standards at the time of capture. Final map unit boundaries adjusted to account for field data. Core landform, soil and vegetation attributes attached to map units with additional attributes unique to individual surveys.

Positional Accuracy:Polygon data - map unit boundaries delineated on screen using geographical information system software. Positional accuracy generally considered to be high. The NT Visualiser Aerial Photography Mosaic acheives roughly 7.2m accuracy. (Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing Vol. 72, No. 3, March 2006, pp. 249 - 260).
Esri World Imagery provides one meter or better satellite and aerial imagery in many parts of the world and lower resolution satellite imagery worldwide. The positional accuracy in the Deep Well area is likely at the lower end of this.

Attribute Accuracy:The attribute information conforms to the 'Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook' at time of capture. Attributes are assigned according to the dominant facet within each Land System. The department's list of core attribute values, described in the Data Dictionary below, have been added to each polygon.
The dominant facet of each land system has been assessed for GENERAL LAND CAPABILITY, evaluating landscape characteristics that could influence the general use of the land. A General Land Capability Class of 1: Land with negligible constraints, to Class 4: Land with Extreme Constraints, has been assigned to each land facet. The capability of the dominant land facet is assigned to each land system.
Information about the General Land Capability of individual land facets within each Land System is available in the accompanying report. (See Supplementary Information in this metadata record for report PDF download details)

Logical Consistency:GIS editing tools were used to rectify all overshoots and undershoots in line work. Polygon topology rules applied are - must not overlap, must not have gaps and each polygon has only one label.

Completeness:COMPLETE

Contacts

Name Organisation Position Role Phone Fax Email

Data Requests Officer Department of Lands, Planning and Environment Geospatial Services Unit (on behalf of department) distributor Datarequests.DLPE@nt.gov.au

Name	Organisation	Position	Role	Phone	Fax	Email
Data Requests Officer	Department of Lands, Planning and Environment	Geospatial Services Unit (on behalf of department)	distributor			Datarequests.DLPE@nt.gov.au

Data Dictionary

Attribute Attribute Description Possible Code Code Description

CLASS_ACSS Alias: Class Acid Sulfate Soils
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably, making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

CLASS_DEP Alias: Class Soil Depth
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

CLASS_DRA Alias: Class Soil Drainage
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

CLASS_FLO Alias: Class Flooding
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

CLASS_MICR Alias: Class Microrelief
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

CLASS_ROC Alias: Class Surface Rock
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

CLASS_SAL Alias: Class Salinity
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

CLASS_SLO Alias: Class Slope
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

CLASS_SOD Alias: Class Sodicity
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

CLASS_WIN Alias: Class Wind Erosion
Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

LCAP_CLASS Alias: Land Capability Class
The General Land Capability Class is defined by the most constrained of the ten sub-classes. Land capability assessment is not land use specific and does not consider land management practices or project specific requirements. 1 Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

2 Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.

3 Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.

4 Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.

LF_CLASS Alias: Landform Class
Landform class is a system adopted by the department. The categories do not conform to national criteria even though some have been sourced from Australian Soil and Land Survey - Field Handbook (Mc Donald et.al. 1998)

LF_DESC Alias: Landform Description
Landform description includes details about landform, and general notes pertaining to slope, surface gravel and other details describing the land unit.

MAP_UNIT Alias: Map Unit
The MAP_UNIT field is the map unit label from the spatial dataset (i.e. 9a2) and aligns with the dominant landform class for each Land System. 10 Drainage Systems

18 Sandplains

19 Dunefields

6 Rises

7 Low Rises

9 Alluvial Plains

SOIL Alias: Dominant Soil Order
The dominant soil order described in a land unit is recorded.

SOIL_DESC Alias: Soil Description
Soil description summarising dominant soils within the land unit and typically includes soil depth, drainage, colour and other notes describing the soil.

SOIL_SYS Alias: Soil Classification System
The soil classification system used to describe the soil in the land unit description.

SPECIES_1 Alias: Veg Dom Species 1
The dominant vegetation species described in a map unit. The order of species listed determines their dominance.

SPECIES_2 Alias: Veg Dom Species 2
Where 2 dominant vegetation species were described in a map unit. The order of species listed determines their dominance.

SPECIES_3 Alias: Veg Dom Species 3
Where 3 dominant vegetation species described in a map unit. The order of species listed determines their dominance.

SUMMARY Alias: Summary
Brief summary of the map unit.

SURVEY_ID Alias: Survey Identifier
A department code that usually refers to the first five characters from the original survey site sheet.

SURVEY_NME Alias: Survey Name
The name of the survey area or report to which the mapping refers.

VEG_DESC Alias: Vegetation description
NVIS Level 4 (Sub-formation level) description. Dominant genus (or genera) plus growth form, cover andheight for each of the three main strata. (i.e. Upper, Mid and Ground)

VEG_STRUC Alias: Dominant Veg Structure
Vegetation structural classes from NVIS (ESCAVI 2003), Walker and Hopkins (1998) and Specht (1970) classification schemes.

VEG_SYS Alias: Veg Classification System
The National Vegetation Information System (NVIS) classification system.

Attribute	Attribute Description	Possible Code	Code Description
CLASS_ACSS	Alias: Class Acid Sulfate Soils Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably, making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
CLASS_DEP	Alias: Class Soil Depth Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
CLASS_DRA	Alias: Class Soil Drainage Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
CLASS_FLO	Alias: Class Flooding Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
CLASS_MICR	Alias: Class Microrelief Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
CLASS_ROC	Alias: Class Surface Rock Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
CLASS_SAL	Alias: Class Salinity Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
CLASS_SLO	Alias: Class Slope Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
CLASS_SOD	Alias: Class Sodicity Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
CLASS_WIN	Alias: Class Wind Erosion Sub-classes are assessed against a defined set of land capability criteria, and a criteria sub-class from 1 to 4 is assigned.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
LCAP_CLASS	Alias: Land Capability Class The General Land Capability Class is defined by the most constrained of the ten sub-classes. Land capability assessment is not land use specific and does not consider land management practices or project specific requirements.	1	Land with negligible constraints that require only a basic level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		2	Land with minor or moderate constraints that require a greater level of inputs, expertise and investment than Class 1 to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		3	Land with severe constraints that require a high level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably.
		4	Land with extreme constraints that generally require an unacceptable level of inputs, expertise and investment to develop and manage the land sustainably; making it either impractical, uneconomic or environmentally unsound to proceed. Where development must proceed the effects must be mitigated.
LF_CLASS	Alias: Landform Class Landform class is a system adopted by the department. The categories do not conform to national criteria even though some have been sourced from Australian Soil and Land Survey - Field Handbook (Mc Donald et.al. 1998)
LF_DESC	Alias: Landform Description Landform description includes details about landform, and general notes pertaining to slope, surface gravel and other details describing the land unit.
MAP_UNIT	Alias: Map Unit The MAP_UNIT field is the map unit label from the spatial dataset (i.e. 9a2) and aligns with the dominant landform class for each Land System.	10	Drainage Systems
		18	Sandplains
		19	Dunefields
		6	Rises
		7	Low Rises
		9	Alluvial Plains
SOIL	Alias: Dominant Soil Order The dominant soil order described in a land unit is recorded.
SOIL_DESC	Alias: Soil Description Soil description summarising dominant soils within the land unit and typically includes soil depth, drainage, colour and other notes describing the soil.
SOIL_SYS	Alias: Soil Classification System The soil classification system used to describe the soil in the land unit description.
SPECIES_1	Alias: Veg Dom Species 1 The dominant vegetation species described in a map unit. The order of species listed determines their dominance.
SPECIES_2	Alias: Veg Dom Species 2 Where 2 dominant vegetation species were described in a map unit. The order of species listed determines their dominance.
SPECIES_3	Alias: Veg Dom Species 3 Where 3 dominant vegetation species described in a map unit. The order of species listed determines their dominance.
SUMMARY	Alias: Summary Brief summary of the map unit.
SURVEY_ID	Alias: Survey Identifier A department code that usually refers to the first five characters from the original survey site sheet.
SURVEY_NME	Alias: Survey Name The name of the survey area or report to which the mapping refers.
VEG_DESC	Alias: Vegetation description NVIS Level 4 (Sub-formation level) description. Dominant genus (or genera) plus growth form, cover andheight for each of the three main strata. (i.e. Upper, Mid and Ground)
VEG_STRUC	Alias: Dominant Veg Structure Vegetation structural classes from NVIS (ESCAVI 2003), Walker and Hopkins (1998) and Specht (1970) classification schemes.
VEG_SYS	Alias: Veg Classification System The National Vegetation Information System (NVIS) classification system.

Supplementary Information

Department Survey Code: DPW21
This spatial dataset should not be used at scales greater than 1: 100,000

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE
Petursson, J. & Burley, P. (2025). Mapping the Future - Land Resources of NTP 3910 in the Deep Well Area. Technical Report 17/2025. Department of Lands, Planning and Environment. Darwin, Northern Territory.

Download the spatial data via ftp-dlrm.nt.gov.au/main.html?download&weblink=d775ad386dc5b57442d0d2355dc52d72&realfilename=LandUnits_dpw_100.zip
Download the report (PDF) via the Northern Territory Library & Archives NT: hdl.handle.net/10070/993277

ASSOCIATED INFORMATION:
Stokeld, D., Duong, A., Nano, C. (2021). Mapping the Future, Biodiversity assessment of NTP 3910 in the Deep Well area. Technical Report 27/2021. Department of Environment, Parks and Water Security. Darwin, Northern Territory.

This record maintained using the NTLIS Metadata Tool

Metadata : Mapping the Future - Land Resources of NTP 3910 in the Deep Well Area